July 16, 2008

I summarize Foo Camp 2008 activities so you don't have to


Attending the O'Reilly Foo Camp
This last weekend I attended Foo Camp, which is a yearly O'Reilly event. It was a lot of fun because of the crowd - an eclectic mix of artists, philosophers, geeks, writers, and business folks. Special thanks for Dave McClure for letting me hitch along in his car and connecting me to the O'Reilly folks. Also, Bryce from OATV was kind enough to let me crash some of the Startup Camp sessions.

I wanted to link to a couple of the blog posts and photo galleries out there about the event:

Summaries of Foo Camp activities
I went to a large number of sessions - there were something like a dozen rooms with 10 sessions throughout the day, so over 3 days there were a ton of speakers and activities.

Anyway, here are some summaries of what went on:

Camping at the conference
Grab a spot to sleep in the O'Reilly offices - it's cold and wet outside

Session on distributed social networks
Everyone at Foo wants data portability, companies resist it, and consumers don't care

Session on economics not being a branch of physics
Lots of borrowing + forcing banks to mark-to-market the value of their assets + borrowing restrictions that are depending on assets means that banks catastrophically dump their assets in a spiral of death if anyone in the ecosystem has any problems

Showering facilities
With a half dozen showers at the conference and 350+ attendees, the only time to shower is at weird hours, like 2 or 3am

Session on granular measurement of carbon footprint
We're all screwed unless we reduce our carbon footprint to 2500 somethingaruther

Session on Playboy's existential crisis
 Hugh Hefner got brought back as part of the playboy brand because of Viagra, but when he dies the brand will get hurt unless they appoint George Clooney as the next Hugh Hefner, kinda like James Bond

Day 3 of the conference
With a half dozen showers and 350+ attendees, a lot of people seem to choose to not shower

Werewolf
If someone has a grin on their face when they are telling everyone else they're a villager, it means they are actually a werewolf since no one could be that happy to be a villager

Session on the future of news
Journalism is in danger because consumers want celebrity gossip and they won't pay more for investigative reporting - Rupert Murdoch is to blame and Seymour Hirch is the best writer ever!1!!1!!

Session on hiring great people
No one in san francisco can hire anyone locally, it's all about importing smart people from outside the city

Session on corporate sing-a-longs
No matter how many people you invite to attend a corporate sing-a-long session, none of them will sing

Conclusion
OK, please tell me if I missed anything ;-)

July 15, 2008

In Seattle from the 25th to 30th - who wants to meet up?

I'm going to a wedding in Seattle next weekend, and will stick around a couple days to catch up with people. If anyone would like to meet up while I'm back there, shoot me an e-mail.

In particular, I'd enjoy meeting:

  • smart engineers and future entrepreneurs
  • advertising people (agency, ad network, etc)
  • database marketing and stats folks
  • startup entrepreneurs, especially the ones who are looking to go BIG! ;-)

Shoot me a note at voodoo [at] gmail!

July 14, 2008

Online advertising during a recession: 5 key trends for ad-based startups

One of my top 25 search queries is "recession advertising" so I thought I'd expand on this topic a little bit, since important parts of the economy continue to implode and the folks who are thinking about business models should be worried.

Ultimately, the dynamics here are complex and uncertain, but here some of the key trends worth watching if you're an advertising-based startup:

  1. Accelerating movement of offline to online ad spend
  2. Brand areas weak, direct response will be less affected
  3. Weak areas to watch: Video, social networks, communication, etc.
  4. Rise of direct-to-consumer revenues?
  5. Timing is everything

Let's dive into these topics more below...

1) Acceleration movement of offline to online ad spend
The first key issue revolves around the fact that advertising spend is already shifting online from other types of media. In the direct response sector, classifieds are obviously moving from newspapers to services like Monster and Craigslist. In brand advertising, dollars are moving from TV onto high-quality publishers on the internet. An article from AdAge last year articulates this theory:

Many analysts now agree that when marketing budgets come under pressure in a stressed economy, those sectors that can best document their connection to ROI, such as search-engine advertising, are far more attractive to corporate chiefs than other kinds of less-trackable traditional advertising.

The point is, when your marketing wallet shrinks yet the market gets even more competitive, then companies in crisis will start incorporating methods other than the tried-and-true. Even though a lot of brand-based advertising has horribly opaque measurements - clickthroughs, surveys, and other gross metrics don't provide much - it's still better than the TV ad sales guy who asks for huge upfronts without providing much in transparency.

So consider this movement of dollars from offline to online a big plus for any ad-based startup.

2) Brand areas weak, direct response will be less affected
Of course, as the quote above alluded to, the strength of a company's online advertising revenue has a lot to do with the kind of advertising that the company enables. For companies that are focused purely on brand advertising, there will still be hits in budget as the typical reactions - a flight to quality, a flight to metrics - affect brand-oriented startups.

So if your world is focused on engagement, eyeballs, and branding opportunities, things may still get worse before they get better.

On the other hand, the more transactional and close-to-the-money your company is, the more you can expect your revenues to grow and maybe even thrive during this time. These include companies in the following lines of business:

  • ecommerce
  • search
  • classifieds
  • shopping comparison
  • remnant ad networks
  • lead generation
  • product reviews
  • etc.

No matter how bad things get, from a relative standpoint the above businesses are still much better than direct mail, yellow pages, newspapers, and the like. The competitive pressure may make these industries shine - and Google will only get stronger!

3) Weak areas to watch: Video, social networks, communication, etc.
Unfortunately, some of the weakest areas for online spend during a recession are also some of the hottest spaces for startups right now. In general, startups based in video, social networks, and communication applications are some of the most brand-dependent companies out there. The problem is that generally, they have a hard time monetizing pageviews because users aren't in a buying mindset when using the products.

Because of this, you need to be at a critical mass point to be relevant to agencies - and of course, this bar can be expected to rise over time in the case the economy is sputtering. Why spend a dollar with a no-name publisher when you can buy premium inventory for relatively cheap CPMs?

This is not to say that there won't be significant opportunities in this space. For example, I remain quite bullish on web properties like MySpace and Bebo, even as they're brand-focused, because they are attached to organizations that know how to sell brand-based advertising. Similarly, the trends in vertical ad networks provide an interesting opportunity for startups to partner with more established media companies to drive higher revenues as well.

4) Rise of direct-to-consumer revenues?
In the case of a long period of recession, another key opportunity will be for brand-oriented properties to transition their businesses into direct-to-consumer opportunities. Does it surprise you that YouTube is looking into affiliate-based revenue ideas? Or that Slide is thinking about direct-to-consumer opportunities as well? These are smart folks, and they understand that unlike brand advertising, if you can get direct monetization to work, it's stable, scalable, but just very very hard.

And of course, virtual goods fits into this as well, but you all knew that.

The difficult part about these approaches is that unlike ad-based models which allow you to monetize 100% of your audience in one fashion or another, transactional revenues can usually only squeeze cash out of 1-5% of your audience - so what do you do with the rest of them? Are they just loss leaders?

Similarly, it seems that the best transactional revenue models have to be "productized" into actual features within the web property. Building a virtual goods infrastructure is not an easy task, nor is it simple to convince users that all those digital bits actually have value. It's not something that's as easy as copying-and-pasting some Javascript code onto a page to display ads.

5) Timing is everything
And finally, I'd like to close this post with the observation that in the advertising world, particularly in new media channels like online advertising, timing is everything. The brand-oriented web properties that exist today were built in the 2003-2005 era, when brand advertising wasn't so healthy. Similarly, Google was created during a period where online ads was out of vogue, and they had to figure out a model that works.

For the new startups that are building their business plans from scratch today, I think there remains tremendous opportunities in the advertising-supported model. It pays, as many investors can attest, to be counter-cyclical. Perhaps the startups being incorporated this year who reach scale 3-4 years from now will be the ones that really kill the TV ad market by doing things we can't even imagine today.

Good luck! I'm going to YPulse tomorrow - Foo was great - and will be back blogging in no time.

July 10, 2008

Off to conferences for the next few days...

I'll be at Foo and YPulse over the next week or so. If anyone else is going, please give me a shout and we'll meet up! In the meantime, expect little to zero blogging.

If I'm not too lazy, I may log into twitter or blog a bit about the events.

You have Twitter too? If you're feeling bored, you can follow my tweets here. Or the main Foo conference chatter is here. (Note that with the 140 character restriction, it's hard for me to type out my usual essays!)

July 09, 2008

Yahoo's BOSS program doesn't go far enough: Why not open up Yahoo search traffic?

Yahoo BOSS is a neat toy for mashup fans, but doesn't help where you need it to
There's recently been a spate of articles about Yahoo's cutely named BOSS program (Build your Own Search Service) at Cnet, Techcrunch, GigaOm, and others. Techcrunch's headline is that "Yahoo Radically Opens Web Search With BOSS."

Yet when I read more about the program, it seems pretty bland IMHO:

BOSS allows developers to submit queries (and their associated parameters) via an API to retrieve up to 50 web, image, news, or spelling results in XML or JSON format at a time. Per Yahoo’s policy, developers will be required to display its ads next to, or within, their results (although this requirement won’t be imposed until later, Yahoo plans to offer CPM fees as an alternative, and academics will be exempt from any such attempts at monetization completely).

To me, this seems like a neat little service, but it won't change the world- this will just let companies do neat search mashups. Given all the hype around APIs and mashups in recent years, can you think of one mashup company that was commercially successful? I challenge the readers of this blog to name some examples ;-)

The problem is, how will the companies that implement this cool technology end up with any traffic? Seems like this program is a recipe for a bunch of neat PR-generating techie projects without real traction, which is arguably not what Yahoo needs right now.

Search engine result pages as Platforms

I mentioned in a previous blog post on Google's second click that ultimately, the search engine results page is the "platform" on which these portals build. After capturing the first click, via search, they can start building out products to capture subsequent traffic, for example driving address queries into Google Maps. The power in this approach is that huge amounts of traffic go through the SERPs, which then drive traffic to related properties.

Now compare this approach to what Yahoo is offering through BOSS, which lets you harness their infrastructure but doesn't provide any traffic to back you up.

Opening up Yahoo Search traffic, not just the APIs

The extreme approach - well not even that extreme these days, given Facebook - would be to let developers build extensions to the search engine that actually run on top of the *.yahoo.com domain. They can provide an API, do app approvals, and direct only small bits of traffic to each app to test them out - then ramp up the ones that perform better than anything else. There are difficult pieces necessary to make this work, but if done well, it has the potential to change the search game by letting developers target small groups of queries the way that advertisers have been able to.

Maybe in the scheme of things, this is too risky of a move for Yahoo at a time when they are focused on smoothing out revenue growth so everyone can keep their jobs ;-) So perhaps a better player to try something like this out would be Ask, Looksmart, or even Microsoft!

Thoughts and suggestions welcome...

UPDATE: I was pleasantly surprised to hear that the ideas above are implemented in early form by Yahoo SearchMonkey, which I heard about but clearly need to dig into. It looks like these search add-ons go into a clunky gallery that users have to add to their results, which means they still need to work on helping developers get better distribution among the Yahoo search users. You'd think that one of the lessons from the Facebook platform would be that platforms need to build distribution channels into their product above and beyond the APIs that are provided. Thanks to Oren for illuminating me on the SearchMonkey point.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

  • Futuristic Play

    My name is Andrew Chen and I'm an entrepreneur living in San Francisco, CA. This blog covers my thoughts on metrics, viral marketing, user experience, game design, and online advertising.

    I don't write often, so sometimes the easiest thing to do is to subscribe to my blog (which you can do below).

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact me

My Photo

Recommendations by Amazon

ESSAYS ON VIRAL MARKETING, ONLINE ADS, AND GAMES

AdRoll

  • AdRoll

Google Analytics